Homework 1 Possible Solutions Economics of the Environment and Natural Resources/Economics of Sustainability K Foster, CCNY, Spring 2012 |
|
At
P=14, Qd = 60 4(14) = 4 but Qs = 2(14) = 28 so there is a
vast over-supply. Only 4 are actually
bought and sold; the remaining 24 units are not sold. Consumer surplus is the blue triangle shown
below, with height 1 and base of 4 so area is 2. Producer surplus is the pink trapezoid below
with area of 52.
At
P=8, Qd = 60 4(8) = 28 but Qs = 2(8) = 16, so demand is
greater than supply. The quantity bought
and sold is 16 and the rest of the orders are unfulfilled. So Producer Surplus is the area of the pink
triangle below, .5*8*16 = 64. Consumer
Surplus is the blue trapezoid with area 3*16 + .5*4*16 = 80.
The lines intersect where 60-4P=2P, so P=10 and Q=20.
Now CS is the triangle of height 5 and width 20 so area is 50; PS is height 10 and base 20 so area is 100. Total Surplus at the high price was 54; at the low price was 144; at the equilibrium price was 150, which is the maximum.
Note
that and
. Put these into the equation about tax, so
,
Qt
= 16, where Ps = 8 and Pd = 11. Now PS =
64 (from part c); CS is .5*4*16 = 32.
Government revenue is 16*3 = 48. Total
surplus is 144 and DWL is 6 the area of the triangle with height 3 and
base (20-16)=4.
Now the free market case has DWL since too much is produced: to cost to society is the 0.5Q paid by firms plus 3.5. The social optimum would be the quantity where .5Q+3.5 = 15-.25Q, so Q** = 15.33 and P**=11.167. The free-market DWL is the grey triangle below with area of .5*3.5*(20-15.33) = 8.167.
However with the tax, the quantity produced and consumed has fallen to 16 so the DWL is much smaller since there are only .67 too many units of output so the damage is also smaller. The DWL in this case is just .5*(11.167-11)*(16-15.33) = 0.056, shown as the smaller light-grey triangle.
If the coast is 100 tourism then T=.5*sqrt(100)=5. If the coast is 100 business then B=3*sqrt(100) = 30.
From and
,
write
.
At T=0, B=30; at T=1, B=29.4 so the cost of the first thousand T is 0.6 of B (60 jobs).
From T=4 to T=5, B falls from 18 to zero so the cost of the last thousand tourists is 18 (so 1800 jobs).
This is in the spreadsheet (for each tenth of a T); graph is below.
There
is no unambiguous choice of "best" it depends on other information such as the
non-pecuniary benefits of the unspoiled coastline, the relative valuation of
tourists vs jobs, the sustainability of each choice and the future prospects.
Question 2.3 asks about general shapes of PPFs for things like cattle vs lumber; it seems reasonable to expect that the shape will be similar to the graphs we've shown so that, from a situation of 100% cattle and no lumber, the first extractions of lumber would barely interfere with the cattle, but more lumber would mean fewer cattle.
Question 2.4 asks for demand curves of Ally, who would pay $30 for one umbrella but zero additional for more umbrellas, versus soccer balls that are $9 no matter how many she already has. These would look like: